
HOPEGOLD (SHENZHEN) BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTING CO.,LTD
Global professional notarization and certification service agency
Contact Us
Hotline: +86-755-28261216
Email: Bruce@hopegold.cn
The Apostille Convention has 129 Contracting Parties as of October 2026. Of those, 128 are in force today; Thailand is listed with an entry-into-force date of 28 February 2027. The list changes roughly every few months, so the date on any published list matters more than the number itself.
The Convention of 5 October 1961 Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents — almost always called the Apostille Convention — has been in force since 24 January 1965. It now covers 129 listed Parties across five regions.
| Region | Contracting Parties |
|---|---|
| Europe | 44 |
| Americas | 33 |
| Asia | 25 |
| Africa | 17 |
| Oceania | 10 |
| Total | 129 |
Two things about this table are worth pausing on. First, Europe is over a third of the list, which is why Apostilles feel routine there and unusual elsewhere. Second, the Americas figure of 33 is inflated by a long tail of Caribbean states that joined by succession in the 1970s and 1980s — they are full Parties, and documents going to them are handled exactly like documents going to Canada or Brazil.
The regional split is a reading aid, not a legal category. The Convention does not create regions; it creates a single list of Parties, and every Party is bound to accept every other Party's Apostilles without further authentication.
Below is the full list, grouped by region. The date in the second column is the entry into force for that Party — not the date it signed, acceded, or succeeded to the Convention. The third column flags whether the Convention is operative for that Party today.
| Country | Entry into force | In force today? |
|---|---|---|
| Albania | 9 May 2004 | Yes |
| Andorra | 31 December 1996 | Yes |
| Austria | 13 January 1968 | Yes |
| Belarus | 31 May 1992 | Yes |
| Belgium | 9 February 1976 | Yes |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 6 March 1992 | Yes |
| Bulgaria | 29 April 2001 | Yes |
| Croatia | 8 October 1991 | Yes |
| Cyprus | 30 April 1973 | Yes |
| Czechia | 16 March 1999 | Yes |
| Denmark | 29 December 2006 | Yes |
| Estonia | 30 September 2001 | Yes |
| Finland | 26 August 1985 | Yes |
| France | 24 January 1965 | Yes |
| Germany | 13 February 1966 | Yes |
| Greece | 18 May 1985 | Yes |
| Hungary | 18 January 1973 | Yes |
| Iceland | 27 November 2004 | Yes |
| Ireland | 9 March 1999 | Yes |
| Italy | 11 February 1978 | Yes |
| Latvia | 30 January 1996 | Yes |
| Liechtenstein | 17 September 1972 | Yes |
| Lithuania | 19 July 1997 | Yes |
| Luxembourg | 3 June 1979 | Yes |
| Malta | 3 March 1968 | Yes |
| Monaco | 31 December 2002 | Yes |
| Montenegro | 3 June 2006 | Yes |
| Netherlands | 8 October 1965 | Yes |
| North Macedonia | 17 November 1991 | Yes |
| Norway | 29 July 1983 | Yes |
| Poland | 14 August 2005 | Yes |
| Portugal | 4 February 1969 | Yes |
| Republic of Moldova | 16 March 2007 | Yes |
| Romania | 16 March 2001 | Yes |
| Russia | 31 May 1992 | Yes |
| San Marino | 13 February 1995 | Yes |
| Serbia | 27 April 1992 | Yes |
| Slovakia | 18 February 2002 | Yes |
| Slovenia | 25 June 1991 | Yes |
| Spain | 25 September 1978 | Yes |
| Sweden | 1 May 1999 | Yes |
| Switzerland | 11 March 1973 | Yes |
| Ukraine | 22 December 2003 | Yes |
| United Kingdom | 24 January 1965 | Yes |
| Country | Entry into force | In force today? |
|---|---|---|
| Antigua and Barbuda | 1 November 1981 | Yes |
| Argentina | 18 February 1988 | Yes |
| Bahamas | 10 July 1973 | Yes |
| Barbados | 30 November 1966 | Yes |
| Belize | 11 April 1993 | Yes |
| Bolivia | 7 May 2018 | Yes |
| Brazil | 14 August 2016 | Yes |
| Canada | 11 January 2024 | Yes |
| Chile | 30 August 2016 | Yes |
| Colombia | 30 January 2001 | Yes |
| Costa Rica | 14 December 2011 | Yes |
| Dominica | 3 November 1978 | Yes |
| Dominican Republic | 30 August 2009 | Yes |
| Ecuador | 2 April 2005 | Yes |
| El Salvador | 31 May 1996 | Yes |
| Grenada | 7 April 2002 | Yes |
| Guatemala | 18 September 2017 | Yes |
| Guyana | 18 April 2019 | Yes |
| Honduras | 30 September 2004 | Yes |
| Jamaica | 3 July 2021 | Yes |
| Mexico | 14 August 1995 | Yes |
| Nicaragua | 14 May 2013 | Yes |
| Panama | 4 August 1991 | Yes |
| Paraguay | 30 August 2014 | Yes |
| Peru | 30 September 2010 | Yes |
| Saint Kitts and Nevis | 14 December 1994 | Yes |
| Saint Lucia | 31 July 2002 | Yes |
| Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 27 October 1979 | Yes |
| Suriname | 25 November 1975 | Yes |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 14 July 2000 | Yes |
| United States | 15 October 1981 | Yes |
| Uruguay | 14 October 2012 | Yes |
| Venezuela | 16 March 1999 | Yes |
| Country | Entry into force | In force today? |
|---|---|---|
| Armenia | 14 August 1994 | Yes |
| Azerbaijan | 2 March 2005 | Yes |
| Bahrain | 31 December 2013 | Yes |
| Bangladesh | 30 March 2025 | Yes |
| Brunei Darussalam | 3 December 1987 | Yes |
| China | 7 November 2023 | Yes |
| Georgia | 14 May 2007 | Yes |
| India | 14 July 2005 | Yes |
| Indonesia | 4 June 2022 | Yes |
| Israel | 14 August 1978 | Yes |
| Japan | 27 July 1970 | Yes |
| Kazakhstan | 30 January 2001 | Yes |
| Kyrgyzstan | 31 July 2011 | Yes |
| Mongolia | 31 December 2009 | Yes |
| Oman | 30 January 2012 | Yes |
| Pakistan | 9 March 2023 | Yes |
| Philippines | 14 May 2019 | Yes |
| Republic of Korea | 14 July 2007 | Yes |
| Saudi Arabia | 7 December 2022 | Yes |
| Singapore | 16 September 2021 | Yes |
| Tajikistan | 31 October 2015 | Yes |
| Thailand | 28 February 2027 | No — scheduled |
| Türkiye | 29 September 1985 | Yes |
| Uzbekistan | 15 April 2012 | Yes |
| Viet Nam | 11 September 2026 | Yes |
| Country | Entry into force | In force today? |
|---|---|---|
| Algeria | 9 July 2026 | Yes |
| Botswana | 30 September 1966 | Yes |
| Burundi | 13 February 2015 | Yes |
| Cabo Verde | 13 February 2010 | Yes |
| Eswatini | 6 September 1968 | Yes |
| Lesotho | 4 October 1966 | Yes |
| Liberia | 8 February 1996 | Yes |
| Malawi | 2 December 1967 | Yes |
| Mauritius | 12 March 1968 | Yes |
| Morocco | 14 August 2016 | Yes |
| Namibia | 30 January 2001 | Yes |
| Rwanda | 5 June 2024 | Yes |
| Sao Tome and Principe | 13 September 2008 | Yes |
| Senegal | 23 March 2023 | Yes |
| Seychelles | 31 March 1979 | Yes |
| South Africa | 30 April 1995 | Yes |
| Tunisia | 30 March 2018 | Yes |
| Country | Entry into force | In force today? |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 16 March 1995 | Yes |
| Cook Islands | 30 April 2005 | Yes |
| Fiji | 10 October 1970 | Yes |
| Marshall Islands | 14 August 1992 | Yes |
| New Zealand | 22 November 2001 | Yes |
| Niue | 2 March 1999 | Yes |
| Palau | 23 June 2020 | Yes |
| Samoa | 13 September 1999 | Yes |
| Tonga | 4 June 1970 | Yes |
| Vanuatu | 30 July 1980 | Yes |
If you are checking a single destination, the fastest way is to search this page for the country name. If the name is not here, the destination is not a Party and you need consular legalisation.
This is the single most common misreading of the Convention, and it produces most of the wrong answers people get from secondary sources.
A State becomes a Party in one of four ways, and each produces a different date:
The practical consequence: if you find a date for a country, check which of these four it is before you rely on it. A "joined in 2023" line on a blog post can mean deposit, ratification, or entry into force, and the gap between them is exactly the window in which people send documents down the wrong chain.
Any list older than a few months is partly wrong. Eleven Parties have had an entry into force date in 2022 or later, and one of those dates has not arrived yet.
| Country | Entry into force | Status as of 27 October 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 4 June 2022 | In force |
| Saudi Arabia | 7 December 2022 | In force |
| Pakistan | 9 March 2023 | In force |
| Senegal | 23 March 2023 | In force |
| China | 7 November 2023 | In force |
| Canada | 11 January 2024 | In force |
| Rwanda | 5 June 2024 | In force |
| Bangladesh | 30 March 2025 | In force |
| Algeria | 9 July 2026 | In force |
| Viet Nam | 11 September 2026 | In force |
| Thailand | 28 February 2027 | Scheduled — not yet operative |
Note the pattern in the right-hand column: the newest entries are clustered in Africa, Asia and Latin America. If you last checked the list in 2022, several of the destinations you assumed required consular legalisation now accept an Apostille instead — Brazil, Chile, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, the Philippines, Rwanda, Senegal and Algeria all changed status in that window.
Three Parties have extended the Convention to territories for which they are responsible. These territories accept and issue Apostilles, but they are not independent Parties, and their documents are handled under the parent State's authority.
| Party | Territories covered | What this means in practice |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | Crown dependencies and overseas territories, including the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, Gibraltar, Guernsey, Jersey and the Isle of Man. A BVI company document carries a UK-territory Apostille, not a UK FCDO one. |
| Netherlands | 4 | Caribbean parts of the Kingdom. Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten issue their own Apostilles under the Kingdom's extension. |
| Denmark | 1 | Greenland and the Faroe Islands are covered by Denmark's Party status. |
This matters commercially more than it looks. A company registered in the British Virgin Islands is one of the most common structures in cross-border transactions, and its documents do not go through London. They are apostilled in the territory where the document was issued. Sending a BVI certificate of incorporation to the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office will get it returned.
China is a single Party with three separate application dates, and mixing them up is the most common source of confusion for anyone dealing with Chinese-language documents.
| Jurisdiction | Convention applies from | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Mainland China | 7 November 2023 | China acceded on 8 March 2023; entry into force followed on 7 November 2023. Documents issued by mainland notary offices and public authorities now take an Apostille (附加证明书) instead of consular legalisation. |
| Hong Kong SAR | 25 April 1965 | Applied through the United Kingdom's extension from 25 April 1965 and continued after the handover from 1 July 1997. Hong Kong has issued Apostilles for six decades. |
| Macao SAR | 4 February 1969 | Applied through Portugal's extension from 4 February 1969 and continued from 20 December 1999. |
If your document was issued in Hong Kong and is going to a Contracting Party anywhere else in the world, the Apostille Service Office at the High Court issues it for HK$125 per application, normally in two working days.
India is on the list. The Convention has been in force for India since 14 July 2005. And yet a document issued in China and destined for India will not receive an Apostille.
The reason is Article 12 of the Convention, which allows a Contracting Party to object to another State's accession. Where an objection has been raised, the Convention does not take effect between those two States. The Hong Kong Judiciary's published list of Contracting Parties carries this footnote against India, and it is worth quoting exactly:
Two clarifications, because this footnote is routinely over-read:
The same footnote appears against one other entry on that list. The general lesson is that "is it a Contracting Party?" is necessary but not sufficient — you also need to know whether the Convention is actually operative between your issuing State and your destination.
The Convention does not create a central issuer. Each Party designates its own competent authorities, and the correct one depends on where the document was issued, not where you live or where you are sending it.
| Issuing jurisdiction | Competent authority | Official fee |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong SAR | Apostille Service Office, High Court Registry (Counter 5, LG1/F, High Court Building) | HK$125 per application |
| Mainland China | Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and authorised local Foreign Affairs Offices | RMB 50 (civil) / RMB 100 (commercial) per document |
| United States — state-level documents | The Secretary of State of the issuing state | Varies: USD 3 (Georgia) to USD 30 (Delaware) |
| United States — federal documents | US Department of State, Office of Authentications | USD 20 per document |
| United Kingdom | FCDO Legalisation Office | GBP 45 standard / GBP 35 e-Apostille |
| Canada | Global Affairs Canada | No fee for the Apostille itself |
The United States is the clearest illustration of why the issuing jurisdiction controls. A birth certificate from California is apostilled by the California Secretary of State, not by Washington. An FBI background check — a federal document — is apostilled by the US Department of State. The same applicant, the same destination country, two different authorities, two different fees, two different mailing addresses.
There is no single "Apostille fee". The total is made up of payments to different parties, and no one party can collect the others on your behalf.
| Cost component | Paid to | Typical range |
|---|---|---|
| Certified copy of the underlying document | The issuing registry (vital records office, county clerk, company registry) | USD 10–30 per copy; some registries take 6–10 weeks |
| Notarisation, where the document requires it | A notary public in the issuing jurisdiction | USD 5–25 per act |
| Translation, where the destination requires it | A sworn or certified translator | Varies by language pair and length |
| Apostille fee | The designated competent authority | USD 3–30; HKD 125 in Hong Kong; GBP 45 in the UK |
| Return postage | Courier or postal service | GBP 6–42 from the UK depending on destination |
| Service fee, if you use one | 橙事公证认证 | Quoted per document type, count and destination — get a quote → |
The component people underestimate is the first one. In several US states the Apostille itself costs three dollars and takes two working days, while the certified copy it must be attached to takes up to ten weeks to arrive. Budgeting for the Apostille fee and not for the registry lead time is how deadlines get missed.
An Apostille is a straightforward instrument. Plenty of people obtain one without help. The cases where it becomes difficult are specific:
If none of these apply, the tables above are probably all you need. If two or more apply, the cost of getting the chain wrong usually exceeds the cost of having it handled — contact us and we will confirm the correct authority and route first.
| Rejection reason | What happened | How to avoid it |
|---|---|---|
| Document was notarised when it should not have been | US federal documents become invalid if notarised before submission to the Office of Authentications | Check whether the document is state-level or federal before doing anything to it |
| Sent to the wrong authority | A BVI company document sent to the UK FCDO, or a California birth certificate sent to the US Department of State | The issuing jurisdiction decides the authority — see section 8 |
| Photocopy instead of a certified copy | Most authorities reject photocopies; the signature being authenticated must be original | Order a certified copy from the registry, not a scan of one |
| Apostille issued but not accepted at destination | The destination is a Party but the Convention is not operative between the two States, or the receiving body requires consular legalisation regardless | Verify the bilateral position, not just Party status |
| Expired or out-of-window records | Some authorities only authenticate records issued within a fixed period | Check the authority's record-age rule before ordering |
| Wrong destination named on the application | Several authorities require the country of intended use on the form | State the destination country exactly as it appears on the receiving body's request |
An Apostille certifies the signature, the capacity of the signatory, and the seal or stamp on the document. It does not certify the content of the document. That distinction is stated on the certificate itself and is the first thing to check when someone questions an Apostille.
Verification routes differ by authority:
129 Parties are listed as of October 2026, of which 128 are in force today. Thailand is listed with an entry-into-force date of 28 February 2027. HCCH's own status table is the authoritative source and should be checked before relying on any count, including this one.
Search the tables in section 2. If the country is not there, it is not a Party, and the document needs consular legalisation instead of an Apostille.
Not automatically. Where a Party has objected to another State's accession under Article 12, the Convention does not take effect between those two States. India is the case that affects China-issued documents most often.
The Apostille must come from the jurisdiction that issued the document. Being physically elsewhere does not change which authority is competent, though it may change how you submit — by post, by courier, or through someone local.
Between one working day and several weeks, depending on the authority. The Apostille itself is usually the fast part; obtaining the certified copy it attaches to is often slower.
No. It certifies the signature, the signatory's capacity and the seal. It says nothing about the content or the truth of what the document states.
The official fee buys one certificate. A service covers the work around it: identifying the correct authority, obtaining certified copies from registries that may not serve overseas applicants, handling payment instruments that must be drawn on a local bank, managing the return courier, and correcting the submission if it is rejected. You are paying for the chain, not the certificate.
Often yes. Sections 9 to 11 set out what the chain involves and where it usually breaks. If your document was issued in a jurisdiction you can access and your destination is a Party with no bilateral complication, doing it yourself is entirely reasonable.
Convention status, entry-into-force dates and territorial extensions: HCCH Status Table for the Apostille Convention (cid=41), updated 30 June 2026. Party list cross-checked against the Hong Kong Judiciary's published list of Contracting Parties, version dated 11 September 2026. The India and Article 12 footnote is quoted verbatim from that list. China's accession and entry-into-force dates verified against the HCCH status table. Fees quoted in section 8 are the official published fees of each named authority. All figures last verified 27 October 2026; this page is reviewed when the status table changes.